Summary of prosodic processes represented in Line 2.
Table 1 sums up those prosodic phenomena implicit in McQuown’s representation that are made explicit in Line 2 of the texts. These processes occur at three levels, the level of the Intonational Phrase (IP), the level of the Accentual Phrase (AP), and the level of the Lexes. I employ the term “Lex” to refer to a morphosyntactic word-form (by analogy with phone : phoneme, morph : morpheme, lex : lexeme) in order to avoid the term “word”, which would have required me to specify whether a given instance of “word” referred to the morphosyntactic unit or the phonological unit. (“Mc” here is Line 1, McQuown’s representation.)
Table 1. Summary of prosodic processes represented in Line 2. | ||||
Domain | Size | Notation | Processes | |
Domain | Process | |||
Intonational Phrase (IP) | A clause, an utterance | « … » | ||
>},» |
|
|||
>}.» |
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Accentual Phrase (AP) | One to several lexes | { … } |
|
|
…>}{<… | >≡ˑ}{… |
|
||
…>}{<… | …}{ⁿ≡< |
|
||
Lex | One morphosyntactic word-form |
< … > | ||
{…><…} | •H |
|
The symbols used in Table 1 (and in the first two lines of the texts) are the following:
Line 1: McQuown’s representation. | ||
“ _,” | End of Intonational Phrase, continuing intonation. | |
“ _.” | End of Intonational Phrase, final intonation. | |
Line 2: Prosodic representation. | ||
«…» | Intonational Phrase (IP) | |
{…} | Accentual Phrase (AP) | |
<…> | Lex | |
•H | lengthening and devoicing of previous resonant | |
≡ˑ | Prosodic vowel-lengthening | |
ⁿ≡ | Prosodic epenthesis of nasal | |
,» | IP, Continuing Intonation | |
.» | IP, Phrase Final Intonation | |
Lexical Stress occurs on the last vowel of “…>”, unless it is written on the penult syllable. |
For the description of each of the processes, see Levy (forthcoming).